Posts Tagged ‘cluelessness’

Balmer Talks Tablets

See here.

Microsoft’s behavior here is entirely bizarre. They’ve been pushing desktop versions of Windows on tablets with absolutely no mass-market success for over a decade. Apple releases a tablet with a much more lightweight OS, with UI redesigned from the ground up for a touch device, and has instant mass market success.

And Microsoft’s announces that they’re taking this very seriously… and their response will be to keep pushing desktop versions of Windows on tablets, but… what? Hope that people notice this time because Apple got people paying attention to the tablet market?

Right, good luck with that. The reason people didn’t pay attention to those Windows tablets is because they sucked, and they’ll be perceived even more negatively now that there are better products on the market to compare them with.

Here’s how I see this going: some time in the next 18 months, Microsoft will finally come to terms with the fact that they’re barking up the wrong tree trying to stick a desktop version of Windows onto a tablet. They won’t actually abandon that approach, because internal corporate politics won’t let them and they lack the discipline to actually focus on things that matter. But they will announce an additional project to create a tablet versions of Windows Phone 7, which might even turn out to be a credible technical effort.

Only problem is, by the time that gets market, it’s going to be going up against the iPad, Android tablets, WebOS tablets, and the newly announced Blackberry tablet, some or all of which will be quite well established by then and will be on their second or third generation. And few or none of the value network effects Microsoft benefits from in the Windows market will do anything for them in the tablet market. So, basically, they’re screwed.

A conversation that will occur this summer

Normal Person: [switching instantly back and forth between Evernote and Safari while listening to a Pandora stream, with Loopt updating their location continuously in the background]

Geek: “Hey, you know your iPhone doesn’t support ‘real’ multitasking.”

Normal Person: “Huh?”

iPad critics are just making fun of themselves, right?

Read this reaction to the iPad by Jon Stokes.

It starts off by saying:

Missing is the near-universal “Apple has changed the game” sentiment that followed the launch of the iPhone.

Actually, the reaction to the iPad looks almost precisely like the reaction to the iPhone: there are some people who get the big picture and are saying this thing is a pretty big deal, and then there are the feature checklist analyzers who say it’s not all that exciting because some Lenovo device (that, realistically, we’ll probably never hear of again in two months) has features X, Y and Z.

Stokes then goes on to literally do a feature checklist analysis, complete with actual checklist in table form.

In other words, Stokes is willing to admit that the iPhone was a game changer now, 2.5 years on, because it demonstrably changed the game. But he’s still using precisely the same sort of analysis that lead people to claim the iPhone wasn’t going to be a game changer. He didn’t learn a thing.

He then proceeds to launch into a discussion of what chipset the thing uses. Notably missing from his comments is a single occurrence of the word “interface”.